Cycling in Phoenix should be an enjoyable experience, but the reality for many cyclists is far more dangerous than it should be.
Despite having over 700 miles of bicycle infrastructure, Arizona ranks as the fifth most dangerous state for bicyclists, with Phoenix being a particularly hazardous city for those on two wheels.
If you’ve been injured while riding your bicycle in Phoenix, you know firsthand the devastating impact a bike accident can have on your life.
Unfortunately, the pain doesn’t stop with your physical injuries.
Medical bills quickly pile up, often reaching tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars.
You might even face long-term disabilities that permanently change your life and future earning potential.
On top of that, psychological trauma from a bicycle accident can be just as debilitating as the physical injuries.
Then, to add insult to injury, insurance companies will do anything they can to minimize their liability and payouts, frequently offering settlements far below what you actually need to recover.
The reality is stark: accident victims without legal representation typically receive settlements that are, on average, 350% lower than those with experienced attorneys who know how to maximize settlements (according to a study done by The Insurance Research Council).
The consequences of accepting an inadequate settlement can be devastating:
All as a result of a bicycle accident you were not at fault for!
At Farar & Lewis LLP, our Phoenix bicycle accident attorneys understand these challenges intimately.
With over 40 years of combined experience and more than $250 million recovered for our clients, we have the expertise to help you during this difficult time to the compensation you need to recover from your bicycle accident injuries and get your life back on track.
Many cyclists are shocked to discover how quickly expenses spiral after a serious bicycle accident. The initial emergency room bill is just the beginning of what can become a financial catastrophe:
Even with health insurance, bicycle accident victims face staggering out-of-pocket costs:
The costs continue long after hospital discharge:
Beyond direct medical costs, bicycle accidents create financial burdens including:
The total lifetime cost of serious bicycle accident injuries can easily reach millions of dollars—far beyond what most insurance policies will cover.
Tragically, many cyclists accept quick settlements that cover only a fraction of these costs, leaving them financially devastated when funds run out mid-recovery.
While you’re focused on healing from these potentially serious injuries, insurance companies are working strategically to minimize their payouts to you.
What many cyclists don’t realize is that insurance companies have specific tactics they use against bicycle accident victims, including:
Insurance adjusters often start with the presumption that cyclists are risk-takers who don’t follow traffic rules. This anti-cyclist bias means you’re fighting an uphill battle from the start.
They may claim you:
Many insurance companies capitalize on the unfortunately common sentiment that “bikes don’t belong on the road” to diminish your claim’s value. They know some jurors may share this bias, which gives them leverage to offer lower settlements.
Unlike motorcycle or car accidents where vehicle damage helps prove impact severity, bicycle accidents often result in minimal visible damage to the car that hit you. Insurance companies use this to argue that:
Arizona’s comparative negligence laws are weaponized against cyclists. Insurance companies will claim you:
Their goal is to assign you partial fault to reduce your compensation. Even a 20% fault finding reduces your recovery by 20%.
When accidents occur near bike lanes, insurance companies frequently argue:
Each of these arguments aims to shift responsibility from the driver to you as the cyclist.
Without evidence, insurance companies often suggest you were:
Insurance companies routinely downplay bicycle injuries by:
If you didn’t seek immediate medical attention (common when adrenaline masks pain immediately after an accident), insurers will claim:
Without experienced legal representation, these tactics often succeed in reducing or eliminating compensation for injured cyclists.
At Farar & Lewis LLP, we’ve won over $250 million for injured accident victims, including countless cyclists who faced insurance company tactics designed to minimize their compensation.
We’ve seen too many bicycle accident victims accept settlements that seemed generous initially but proved woefully inadequate as medical bills continued and complications developed.
Our attorneys understand the unique challenges cyclists face in Phoenix and have developed specialized approaches to overcome insurance company tactics aimed specifically at bicycle accident victims.
Our bicycle accident representation includes strategies specifically designed to counter anti-cyclist insurance tactics:
Our team conducts exhaustive investigations focused on elements unique to bicycle accidents.
We analyze bicycle damage to demonstrate impact force, contrary to the “minimal damage” argument insurers typically use.
We map bicycle lanes, road conditions, and collect witness statements addressing cyclist visibility and position.
When available, we gather GPS data from cycling computers and surveillance footage that may have captured the accident to provide indisputable evidence of what occurred.
We work with experts uniquely qualified to support cyclist cases.
Professional bicycle mechanics testify about bicycle damage and impact mechanics.
Bicycle safety experts address cyclist visibility and riding techniques to counter claims of unsafe riding.
Our accident reconstructionists have specific experience with bicycle-vehicle collisions, while human factors experts explain why drivers often fail to see cyclists despite their visibility.
We ensure your injuries are properly documented with attention to injuries common in bicycle accidents.
Neurological specialists assess traumatic brain injuries that may not show on standard imaging.
Plastic surgeons document future procedures needed for road rash scarring.
Orthopedic specialists experienced with complex fracture patterns unique to bicycle accidents ensure proper treatment documentation, while psychological experts address post-traumatic stress common among injured cyclists.
Our attorneys calculate damages unique to cyclists, including lost fitness and competitive opportunities for serious cyclists, custom bicycle replacement costs, and specialized cycling prosthetics for severely injured clients.
We document the loss of cycling as both a recreational activity and transportation method, along with the psychological impact of being unable to return to a beloved activity central to many cyclists’ identities.
We prevent premature settlements by ensuring all injuries, including those with delayed onset, are fully documented.
We work with medical experts to determine maximum medical improvement before settling and calculate lifetime costs of ongoing care for permanent injuries.
This methodical approach accounts for future treatments that may be needed years after the accident, protecting you from future financial burden.
We prepare every case as if it will go to trial, filing comprehensive legal complaints that detail all liability theories and damages.
Our discovery process targets anti-cyclist bias, while depositions focus on drivers’ awareness of cyclist rights.
We prepare compelling visual evidence reconstructing accidents from the cyclist’s perspective, helping judges and juries understand what actually happened from your viewpoint. beyond the at-fault driver.
This includes claims against vehicle manufacturers for defective components, government entities responsible for hazardous road conditions, or businesses that may share liability in your accident.
Insurance companies know we’re prepared for trial and that we succeed in the courtroom, which often leads to better settlement offers without the need for actual litigation.
Our attorneys have the specialized knowledge to accurately document and maximize non-economic damages like pain and suffering. We build compelling evidence of how your injuries have impacted your quality of life, often securing compensation that substantially exceeds medical costs alone.
With Farar & Lewis LLP guiding your case, you’ll avoid critical mistakes that could undermine your claim. We manage all deadlines, handle all communications with insurers, advise you on social media usage, and ensure every aspect of your case is handled with precision to protect your right to maximum compensation.
At Farar & Lewis LLP, we represent clients in all types of bicycle accident cases, including:
Even if no other vehicle was directly involved, you may have a claim against a government entity for road defects, a bicycle manufacturer for defective parts, or other parties.
Complex accidents involving multiple vehicles require careful investigation to determine liability among several parties.
When the at-fault driver flees the scene, we work to identify them through investigation and also explore uninsured motorist coverage and other avenues for your compensation.
Accidents caused by drunk drivers often warrant additional punitive damages. We aggressively pursue maximum compensation from intoxicated drivers who cause serious injuries.
With the rise of cell phone use behind the wheel, distracted driving accidents have increased dramatically. We gather evidence of distraction to strengthen your claim against negligent drivers.
When a driver or passenger opens a car door without checking for approaching cyclists, these “dooring” accidents can cause serious injuries to cyclists who have no time to react. Our Phoenix bicycle accident attorneys can help establish liability in these cases.
Sometimes bicycle accidents are caused by poorly maintained roads, obscured signage, or hazardous construction zones. Our Phoenix bicycle accident attorneys can help determine if a government entity or contractor is liable for your injuries due to unsafe road conditions.
For families who have lost loved ones in fatal bicycle accidents, we provide compassionate representation to secure compensation for funeral expenses, lost financial support, and the emotional impact of your loss.
We believe everyone deserves high-quality legal representation after an injury, regardless of their financial situation.
That’s why we operate exclusively on a contingency fee basis.
You pay absolutely nothing upfront to hire our award-winning legal team.
No retainers, no hourly fees, and no hidden charges.
We only get paid when we successfully recover compensation for you.
This fee structure creates perfect alignment between our goals and yours – we’re motivated to secure the maximum possible settlement because our payment depends on your success.
If we don’t win your case, you don’t owe us a penny for our legal services.
This risk-free approach eliminates financial barriers to justice and ensures you can focus entirely on your recovery while we handle all the legal complexities for you.
This approach has helped hundreds of Phoenix car accident victims access top-tier legal representation they otherwise couldn’t afford, resulting in millions recovered that they would have left on the table without proper advocacy.
If you find yourself the victim of an accident, then hiring a personal injury law firm in Phoenix is a SMART move.
It’s important you hire a lawyer with experience, and one who understands how to negotiate with insurance companies.
At Farar & Lewis LLP, we’ve recovered over $250 million for our clients. We have experience handling tough cases that other firms turn down.
Many injuries can have a huge impact on your life. It’s critical you align yourself with a personal injury lawyer immediately, and never delay getting compensation.
The validity of your claim, your injuries, can be brought into question if you don’t hire a personal injury lawyer.
At Farar & Lewis LLP, we advise our clients of what to do – at every step. We offer a “no fee unless you win,” promise – which means you literally have nothing to worry about.
FOUNDING PARTNER
Farar & Lewis LLP was founded by Joel D. Farar. Mr. Farar possesses extensive knowledge of personal injury law, as well as a steadfast dedication to helping injured individuals. He recognizes that the aftermath of an accident can be overwhelming and filled with suffering. That is why he has devoted his life to helping accident victims obtain the financial compensation and justice they need and deserve.
FOUNDING PARTNER
Justin Farar is a seasoned litigator with large firm experience. Prior to joining Farar & Lewis LLP, Mr. Farar practiced at O’Melveny & Myers, LLP, and clerked for the Honorable Kim McLane Wardlaw on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Mr. Farar served as a Commissioner to the Los Angeles Convention and Exhibition Authority.
PARTNER
Adam is a seasoned trial attorney and tenacious advocate who has represented hundreds of people injured by negligent drivers, property owners, and companies. He has secured millions of dollars for clients involved in automobile accidents, premise cases, slip and falls, dog attacks, and government claims. Mr. Lewis is dedicated to helping his clients fight insurance companies who try to minimize the claims of the injured.
ASSOCIATE
A seasoned legal professional with a diverse background, Matthew Hansen brings a unique blend of legal expertise and a commitment to client advocacy to the esteemed team at Farar & Lewis LLP.
In the realm of personal injury law, Mr. Hansen recognizes the profound impact that accidents can have on individuals’ lives. Mr. Hansen has an unwavering dedication to helping accident victims obtain the justice and financial compensation they need and deserve.
At Farar & Lewis LLP, we reject the “settlement mill” approach that has become all too common among Phoenix car accident attorneys who are quick to settle and leave their clients with less than they should have received.
We believe effective representation requires genuine personal attention from experienced attorneys who understand the nuances of your specific situation.
While many high-volume firms assign clients to paralegals or case managers, our attorneys work directly with you from initial consultation through final resolution.
We deliberately limit our caseload to ensure each client receives the dedicated attention their case deserves.
This strategic approach allows us to develop stronger cases, identify unique compensation opportunities, and build the personalized legal strategies that consistently deliver superior results.
When you call our office, you’ll speak directly with your attorney who knows the details of your case – not a junior associate or intake specialist reading from a script.
Each client receives direct contact information, including personal cell phone numbers, to reach their attorney whenever questions or concerns arise.
There’s never a clock running or additional billing for these communications – we believe open communication is fundamental to effective representation.
Our clients consistently tell us the difference is clear from their first interaction – we’re responsive, engaged, and genuinely invested in your recovery, both physical and financial.
We’ve built our reputation not through billboards or TV commercials, but through personalized service that generates word-of-mouth referrals from satisfied clients.
Our measure of success isn’t just the size of your settlement, but whether you feel confident recommending us to friends and family who find themselves in similar unfortunate circumstances.
This client-first philosophy has helped us maintain a 5-star reputation while securing over $250 million in verdicts and settlements for the people we represent.
The Plaintiff, a commercial trucker, was violently struck by another commercial truck that ran a red light while travelling at a high rate of speed. The Plaintiff was hospitalized for over a month and sustained multiple orthopedic injuries some of which required surgery. The Plaintiff’s medical bills totaled approximately $140,000.00. The Defendant’s insurance company originally only valued the Plaintiff’s case at a few hundred thousand dollars. After a tough litigation, Farar & Lewis was able to recover the Defendant’s policy limits of $1,516,530.18 (*The Defendant was a Canadian trucking company with a policy limit of $2,000,000.00 Canadian Dollars).
Our client’s vehicle was rear-ended. Following the accident, our client developed neck and back pain. After failed conservative treatment, she underwent cervical artificial disk replacement surgery. While the surgery was successful alleviating most of her accident-related pain, she did develop a mild form of a pain disorder called Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. In spite of our client’s serious injuries, the Defendant’s insurance company refused to make any settlement offers arguing that the accident was too minor to cause any of our client’s injuries. After a contentious litigation and shortly before trial , Farar & Lewis, LLP was able to obtain the Defendant’s insurance policy limits of $1 million for our client.
Our client was riding his bike to work when he was struck by a truck. As a result of the accident, our client sustained a serious shoulder injury which required surgery. While our client did lose some of his range of motion in his non-dominant arm, he was able to go back to work and return to most of his daily activities. At mediation, the Defendant’s insurance refused to offer any money over $500,000.00 as they felt this compensation was more than fair for our client. Farar & Lewis, LLP did not agree and moved forward in preparation for trial. Only a couple months later, Farar & Lewis, LLP was able to get our client $1.2 million in compensation.
The Plaintiff’s motorcycle was cut off by the Defendant’s vehicle causing the Plaintiff to violently impact the pavement. The Plaintiff left the scene of the accident without seeking emergency medical care. As a result of the collision, the Plaintiff sustained injuries to his shoulder, knee, as well as a brain injury. The Defense disputed liability claiming that the Plaintiff cut off the Defendant. Farar Law was able to recover $600,000.00 for the Plaintiff the day before trial.
The Plaintiff was a passenger in a major impact rear-end accident. The Plaintiff underwent a successful cervical spine surgery. The Defense argued the Plaintiff’s injuries were pre-existing and not related to the accident. Prior to litigation, the Defense only offered a nominal settlement. Farar & Lewis was able to recover $500,000.00 at mediation for the Plaintiff several months before trial
The plaintiff was a passenger in a vehicle that was rear-ended on the 405 freeway. The Plaintiff’s vehicle sustained very minor damage. As a result of the accident, the Plaintiff developed back pain . After several months of unsuccessful conservative treatment, the Plaintiff underwent a successful back surgery. Shortly after filing a lawsuit, Farar & Lewis was able to obtain the policy limit of $ 489,776 for the Plaintiff.
The Plaintiff was a pedestrian who was struck by the Defendant’s vehicle when he attempted to cross the street in a cross walk. As a result, the Plaintiff sustained a fractured femur. The Defense disputed liability claiming that the Plaintiff entered the cross walk on a red light. Farar Law was able to recover $240,000.00 for the Plaintiff.
The Plaintiff was a passenger in a vehicle that was struck by Defendant’s vehicle. The Plaintiff was in the backseat passenger of a work van that did not have windows. As a result, the Plaintiff was unprepared for the impact. The Plaintiff suffered low back injuries that eventually required surgery. The Plaintiff had a successful surgery. Farar Law was able to recover the Defendant’s policy limits in the amount of $100,000.00 as well as the policy limits under the owner of Plaintiff’s vehicle’s underinsured motorist provision in the amount of $137,500.00 (after a $12,500.00 worker’s compensation offset).
The Plaintiff was rear-ended by the Defendant’s vehicle. The Plaintiff’s vehicle sustained moderate damage. The Plaintiff sustained low back injuries including but not limited to a moderate disk protrusion. Plaintiff underwent a series of cortisone injections and was possibly a candidate for surgery. The Defense argued that the Plaintiff’s injuries were preexisting and not caused by the underlying accident. Farar Law was able to obtain $235,000.00for the Plaintiff prior to filing a lawsuit.
The Plaintiff’s vehicle was rear-ended by Defendant’s vehicle resulting in a minor impact collision. The Plaintiff sustained neck and low back injuries as well as a shoulder injury that required surgery. Prior to retaining Farar Law, the Plaintiff was offered a very small amount of money and was receiving the run around from the insurance company. After only a few months, Farar Law was able to recover a $211,872.92 settlement for the Plaintiff.
The Plaintiff’s vehicle was struck on the passenger side by the Defendant’s vehicle. The Plaintiff’s vehicle sustained minor damage. As a result of the impact, the Plaintiff sustained neck and back injuries. In order for the Plaintiff to receive his accident-related medical care, the Plaintiff’s doctors had to remove a small piece of metal from the plaintiff’s spine (the metal was the result of a 20 year old injury). Farar Law was able to obtain $159,000.00 on behalf of the Plaintiff prior to filing a lawsuit.
The Plaintiff was making a left turn on a green arrow when the Defendant ran a red light and struck the Plaintiff’s vehicle causing moderate damage. As a result of the impact, the Plaintiff sustained neck and back injuries. The Plaintiff, a personal trainer, was unable to resume work for several weeks after the accident. Farar Law was able to recover $130,000.00 on behalf of the Plaintiff.
The Plaintiff was a driver of a vehicle that was rear-ended. The Plaintiff suffered injuries to his neck and back including but not limited to moderate disk herniations. After a short time, Farar Law was able to obtain a settlement of $103,501.00 for the Plaintiff.
The Plaintiff was rear-ended by the Defendant causing moderate damage to the Plaintiff’s vehicle. The Plaintiff sustained neck and back injuries. The Defense argued that the Plaintiff’s injuries were degenerative and not accident related. Farar Law was able to obtain the Defendant’s policy limit in the amount of $100,000.00 on behalf of the Plaintiff.
The Plaintiff was rear-ended by the Defendant causing major damage to the Plaintiff’s vehicle. The Plaintiff sustained neck and back injuries and was recommended a surgery for his back. Farar Law was able to obtain the Defendant’s policy limit in the amount of $100,000.00 on behalf of the Plaintiff.
The Plaintiff was rear-ended by the Defendant causing moderate damage to the Plaintiff’s vehicle. The Plaintiff sustained neck and back injuries and was recommended a surgery for his neck. The Defense argued that the Plaintiff’s injuries were degenerative and not accident related. Farar Law was able to obtain the Defendant’s policy limit in the amount of $100,000.00 on behalf of the Plaintiff.
EXCELLENT 29 reviews![]()
Devon Tarkington2023-11-07Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. They are best Jay2020-11-18Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. One of the best decisions I’ve made in this lifetime was to trust Lewis and Farrar! They are amazing took care of everything for me even had someone drive me to the doctor and wait. They handle everything so you don’t have to stress always just a text or phone call away. They also have an AMAZING team working for them! Chris was the sweetest most professional & caring case manager you could ever hope for! Trust them to get you the best possible settlement. They took care of two accidents for me and although the accidents were unfortunate I was still fortunate to have met them! They turned a bad accident into something positive for me! Definitely choose Lewis and Farrar over anyone else! Andrea Burman2020-09-21Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I used Farar & Lewis LLP for two back to back accidents and they were by far the best firm I've ever worked with. I fired my first attorney who literally couldn't even return my calls or give me any information. I hired Adam Lewis on the spot to help settle my case. He was kind, compassionate and most importantly professional. He got the job done in record speed and recovered all my losses. I couldn't have asked for a better team and experience. If you are in accident and need help look no further then these guys. They are simply the best. Thank you again for all you did for me! El Cubano2020-02-20Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. These guys are the real deal...highly recommended...thanks Justin. K S2020-01-04Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Best attorney services. They have represented me several times and I will continue to use their services Erick Howell2019-11-17Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Great lawyers. Gina “giNA”2019-05-28Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. What can I say this is the number one Law Firm Point Blank.period they have always taken care of me I don't know why people are so dumb to run into me I try my best to stay out of the way of crazy drivers Jake.of.Trades2019-03-15Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I was referred to my attorney Adam by a close family friend who had been in a similar accident as me. I was rear ended in bumper to bumper stop and go LA traffic and slammed into the car in front of me. My insurance company was terrible and the person that hit me was uninsured .Calling Adam may have been the best thing I could have done. He was very professional, knowledgeable, resourceful. Overall good guy that really helped me through my claim. If you get in a wreck, I’d recommend giving Adam a call for a consultation.
In Arizona, the statute of limitations for personal injury claims, including bicycle accidents, is generally two years from the date of the accident. However, if your claim is against a government entity, you may have as little as 180 days to file a notice of claim. It’s crucial to consult with a Phoenix bicycle accident attorney as soon as possible to ensure you don’t miss these important deadlines.
The value of your bicycle accident claim depends on numerous factors, including the severity of your injuries, your medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and more. Our Phoenix bicycle accident attorneys will provide a realistic assessment of your case value based on our experience with similar cases and the specific details of your situation.
While many bicycle accident cases settle out of court, some do require litigation to reach a fair resolution. Our legal team prepares every case as if it will go to trial, ensuring we’re ready if a lawsuit becomes necessary. However, we always strive to reach a favorable settlement without the need for a lengthy court process when possible.
If you’re hit by an uninsured or underinsured driver, you may still have options for recovery. If you have uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage on your own auto insurance policy, it may cover your bicycle accident injuries. Our Phoenix bicycle accident lawyers can also investigate whether other parties might share liability for your accident, such as a vehicle manufacturer or a government entity responsible for road maintenance.
Arizona follows “pure comparative negligence,” meaning multiple parties can share responsibility, with each assigned a percentage of fault. Your compensation is reduced by your percentage of fault, though you can recover damages even if 99% responsible. Insurance companies often try to unfairly assign higher fault percentages to cyclists, which our attorneys counter with strong evidence, expert testimony, and witness statements.
Arizona follows a “pure comparative negligence” rule, which means you can recover compensation even if you were partially at fault for the accident. However, your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault. For example, if you were found to be 20% at fault and your damages total $100,000, you would receive $80,000. Our bicycle accident lawyers will work to minimize any finding of fault on your part.
If you were properly riding in a designated bike lane when hit by a vehicle, this strengthens your case significantly. Arizona law requires motorists to yield to cyclists in bike lanes. However, insurance companies may still try to argue you were partially at fault. Our attorneys document the bike lane’s presence, your proper use of it, and the driver’s violation of your right-of-way.
Don’t accept initial settlement offers without consulting an attorney. Don’t sign documents, provide recorded statements, or cash checks without understanding what rights you may be waiving. Early offers are typically far below your case’s actual worth, failing to account for future needs, pain and suffering, and the full extent of lost wages. Once accepted, you typically cannot seek additional compensation later, even if your condition worsens.
If you or a loved one has been injured in a bicycle accident in Phoenix, don’t wait to seek legal help. The sooner you contact our experienced bicycle accident attorneys, the sooner we can begin building your case and protecting your rights.
At Farar & Lewis LLP, we offer a risk-free consultation to discuss your bicycle accident claim. There’s no obligation, and we’re here to answer all your questions about the legal process and your options for recovery.
Remember, the insurance company is not on your side. Having a skilled Phoenix bicycle accident lawyer advocating for your interests can make a significant difference in the outcome of your case.
Contact Farar & Lewis LLP today to schedule your free consultation and take the first step toward getting the compensation you deserve for your bicycle accident injuries.
© 2025 by Farar & Lewis LLP. All rights reserved.
The information provided in this website does not constitute legal advice and is not a guarantee, warranty or prediction regarding the outcome of any legal matter. Every case is different. Results depend on the unique law, facts and circumstances of each case. No representation is made that the quality of legal service to be performed is higher than that performed by other attorneys. No representation is made that the lawyers are certified specialists or experts in any field of law.